On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 07:09:49 +0800 William Kenworthy <bi...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Not all the proposed changes are bad ... a read only /usr would be > nice, but I object to being forced into what I regard as an unreliable > configuration (or use unreliable, crappy software, eg pulse audio!) > because of these changes - and for those who say I have a choice ... > thats correct, my choice will be eudev. A read only /usr is perfectly possible in any case too, especially if you choose to do things more correctly like avoiding dhcp and as a bonus it's various security issues of the past.
