On 2013-04-07 1:00 PM, Grant Edwards <[email protected]> wrote:
OK, so parts of the news item are not to be taken literally, and other
parts are. Perhaps it would be wise to mark the sections so we can
tell the difference? ;)
Context is everything.
You can't equate
"Remove the udev-postmount init script from your runlevels."
with
"If /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules is an empty file or a
symlink to /dev/null,"
The first can obviously be taken quite literally, while the second just
might actually require a tiny bit of thought - ie, 'hmmm, wonder if they
mean literally 'empty', or just nothing in it that does anything?
Imnsho, the latter is obviously what was meant, while just as obviously
a truly *empty* file would do the same thing as one with no *effective*
content.
