On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 01:29:20PM -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
> After psyching myself and everyone else for the udev 200 update, it
> failed on compile phase! We are using hardened server, and error
> message (which I am transferring over manually) is:
> 
> The specific snippet of code:
>                     die econf failed
> 
> 
> This thing is not going easy....
> 
> 
> N.
> 
> On 4/7/13, Tanstaafl <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote:
> > On 2013-04-07 9:38 AM, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we
> >> should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked
> >> away.
> >
> > Well, hopefully you learned a valuable lesson. I cannot even *fathom*
> > the *idea* of doing a world update on a remote server without going
> > through each and every package to be updated, reading every news item I
> > could find, etc etc ad nauseum, and googling if any systems critical to
> > booting (like udev) are involved.
> >
> > For me, world updates are usually very small because I keep my server
> > updated weekly. I generally sync every day, checking what packages are
> > available, then once that update has been available/unchanged for 3 or 4
> > days, I update it... waiting even a bit longer (and googling for issues)
> > if the package(s) are critical system packages.
> >
> > Admittedly, doing it this way manually wouldn't work for anyone managing
> > more than a few servers, although I imagine it could be scripted by one
> > with the knowledge/desire.
> >
> > But seriously - there has been so much noise about the whole udev
> > situation in the last months (6+?) that you should really be kicking
> > yourself that you did that.
> >
> >

You might not care, but I automatically hit D (delete) in Mutt for every email
that's top-posted. Just saying...
-- 
Happy Penguin Computers               >')
126 Fenco Drive                       ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801                       ^^
supp...@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.           
                                                                                
                                                               
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?                                         
                                                                                
                                                               
A: Top-posting.                                                                 
                                                                                
                                                               
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting

Reply via email to