On 05/22/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 05/22/13 12:36, Samuraiii wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with >> one serious problem: >> I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing >> local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8) and VPN address space (10.2.2.0/8). > This isn't two networks, it's one network and you've got the VPN space > overlapping the LAN space. To oversimplify a little, Don't Do That. > > Use a separate subnet for the VPN. Then traffic to the VPN will be > routed over the VPN interface as intended, but traffic to the LAN will > be routed over the LAN interface. This is what you want, but right now > the VPN and the LAN are the same network, so "routing to the LAN" is the > same as "routing to the VPN", and your network stack doesn't know what > to do with it. > >
To be clear, replacing /8 with /24 would do this: 10.1.1.0/8, as a "network", is really just 10.0.0.0/8. This is also true of 10.2.2.0/8. The bits after the first 8 are irrelevant, since a /8 is being used. Use /24 instead, in this case. It would be good for Samuraiii to read up: http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_IPAddressing.htm
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
