On 2013-08-05 10:10 AM, Anthony G. Basile <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/05/2013 06:19 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
That might be the systemd upstream view point, but definately isn't mine.
Fact is that udev can be built and ran standalone without systemd and
you don't need eudev for that.
For now.
And this is ultimately my primary concern. After reading the huge
threads surrounding this debacle, I wouldn't trust Lennart (or the other
systemd devs) on any promise to not remove this ability at a later date.
And you get a ton of bloat.
And this is the second concern. Both of these are why I decided to go
with eudev. I looked at mdev, but it looked a lot more complicated to
get right than eudev (correct me if I'm wrong someone).
Thanks again Anthony for your work maintaining eudev for 'the rest of
us'... :)
