On 12/08/13 15:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen <[email protected]> wrote:
True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's
how maintainership works.
But trying to lie to people it's somehow solving something currently is
annoying as 'ell and should be corrected where seen.
It is solving the problem of *when* (not if - if the words I have read
from the systemd maintainers can be taken at face value) the systemd
maintainers decide to pull the plug on the ability to have a
systemd-less udev...
Then we will carry a minimal patchset on top of sys-fs/udev that will
keep it working without systemd for long as it's sustainable.
And at this point it's pointless to talk of forking yet, it should be
done only when it's required.
- Samuli
