On 10/13/2013 06:26 AM, shawn wilson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote: > >> >> 1. The iptables-restore syntax is uglier and harder to read. > > I don't get this - the syntax is *chain and then :tables (with > optional counters) instead of -N, and then a bunch of rules, and then > a COMMIT command (the only thing you don't get on the command line. > What am I missing or how is this uglier? >
That's not the syntax, because there is no syntax, but let's forget that point anyway because it's subjective.
