On 10/20/2013 09:34 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
> 
>> That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but
>> from top of my head:
>> We will maintain a minimal patchset that reverts the offending code.
>>
>> As in, that's nothing to be worried about before it happens.
> 
>   That's not always possible, e.g. GNOME 3.8.
> 
I think that's an exception to the rule. I mean, upstream deliberately
chose to depend on systemd/logind and whatnot. In such a situation
there's literally no way to fix it without a fork, and I doubt Gentoo as
an organization is interested in that.

Reply via email to