On Tuesday 05 Nov 2013 06:15:56 Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote: > On 2013-11-05, Bruce Hill <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:43:07PM +0000, Mick wrote: > >> On Monday 04 Nov 2013 19:51:32 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> > On 11/03/2013 02:27 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > >> > > For starters, you should probably merge package.keywords into > >> > > package.accept_keywords; the latter is the "new" standard name, > >> > > though Portage will likely support the old names for a while. Just > >> > > a heads-up on that. > >> > > >> > Thanks for a heads-up. I did as you suggested. > >> > >> Is there going to be a portage news article on this, or did I miss it? > > > > It wasn't two or three years ago... > > > > mingdao@server ~ $ eselect news read 5 > > 2012-09-09-make.conf-and-make.profile-move > > > > Title make.conf and make.profile move > > Author Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto > > <[email protected]> Posted 2012-09-09 > > Revision 1 > > > > Starting next week, new stages will have make.conf and make.profile > > moved from /etc to /etc/portage. This is a change in the installation > > defaults, that will only affect new installs so it doesn't affect > > current systems. > > > > Current users don't need to do anything. But if you want to follow the > > preferred location, you may want to take the chance to move the files > > in your system(s) to the new location. > > But that's about make.conf, not about package.keywords.
Right and I created two symlinks to make sure that at least *I* can still find these files without having to fight against muscle memory. I'm just checking if I need to create some more. BTW, I am running mostly stable here, with the odd testing version thrown in for cheap thrills. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
