Hi,

I got this:

#> emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y @world -vp

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!


[nomerge       ] virtual/rubygems-6:ruby20 [1:ruby18, 4:ruby19] 
RUBY_TARGETS="(ruby20)" 
[nomerge       ]  dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353:2.0 [1.8.7_p374:1.8, 1.9.3_p484:1.9] 
USE="berkdb doc gdbm ipv6 ncurses rdoc readline ssl -debug -examples -rubytests 
-socks5 -tk (-xemacs)" 
[nomerge       ]   dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE="doc {-test}" 
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)" 
[nomerge       ]    dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE="doc {-test} 
(-bash-completion%)" RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)" 
[nomerge       ]     dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE="doc {-test}" 
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby)" 
[ebuild     U  ]      dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 [1.4.8] USE="doc {-test}" 
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)" 107 kB
[ebuild     U  ]      dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE="doc {-test}" 
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)" 146 kB
[ebuild     U  ]       dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE="doc {-test} 
(-bash-completion%)" RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)" 
121 kB
[ebuild     U  ]        dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE="doc {-test}" 
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby)" 457 kB

Total: 4 packages (4 upgrades), Size of downloads: 830 kB

 * Error: circular dependencies:

(dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) depends on
 (dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
  (dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)

It might be possible to break this cycle
by applying the following change:
- dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 (Change USE: -doc)



I added this to /etc/portage/package.use:

=dev-ruby/racc-1.49 -doc

and have set "doc" in the USE flags in make.conf.

I am still getting the above output...

How can I get out of this cycle out of this cycle out of this cycles
out of... ;)

Best regards,
mcc


Reply via email to