On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Tanstaafl <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2014-02-20 4:04 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> No, actually, I think whatever is defined as the current default should >>> dictate which group should be required to do the work. > > >> I think this is where we think differently (regarding this particular >> point). The work must be done by *whomever* wants to do the job. So if >> the systemd people want to do a profile that's fine (and this already >> happened); but if they don't want to, nobody can force them to do it >> (this is academic right now, since they already did the [pretty trivial] >> work). >> >> If the systemd people did not wanted to do the job, then, since you >> can't force them, the people *not* wanting systemd would be the ones >> required to do it. And that makes absolutely no sense. > > > I think we agree, but you keep saying we don't... ;) > > The difference is, since OpenRC is the default, all of the existing profiles > are, by definition, OpenRC based profiles. So, people who don't want systemd > simply have to do... nothing!
OK, I see your point. > As I said before, it is people who want systemd who currently have to 'do > something', and that is as it should be, unless/until the default of OpenRC > is changed to systemd. Agreed. Regards. -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
