-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 14.05.2014 02:39, schrieb Neil Bothwick:
>> Doesn't that screw up the whole idea of checksumming etc ? > > Not to my mind. The bits are recorded and checksummed, that's what > matters. If a bit on a platter is flipped, the decrypted bits will > also change. But then the "container" of the btrfs would be corrupted, right? >> In my understanding the FS (=btrfs or zfs) should have the >> direct contact to the "metal" (=hdd/sdd) to be fully able to >> detect bitrot and stuff. > > It is a recommended method of encryption in the BTRFS FAQ. > > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Does_btrfs_support_encryption.3F > > As btrfs does not support encryption itself, this or ecryptfs are > the only options. Yes, I saw that as well. Will give it a try sometimes soon ... S -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTcyLmAAoJEClcuD1V0PzmV2MP+wWqxS7BhG2RcWgXsDycgstu yosr450brlmx+NRD4PUq47yj+GTsum/9l2WdxAlDZA90f8CaJefnWK9csNLhGBMA BqFT69WNSJEmOJ2l8x2FHZJ1gjyMOQp16q7r0d1G7Asdoubhx/uRSeSjJEnk5gqu UVA77/jbJ1CJSAv4ATnGl67RHWew3KR99VZbbFs7Cr3fjbOZmqWpuSKbf6ZdylHO UatP/sc+ye09sSpUWW5Q4i8v8gF0XC/qy80iPLy84G0+IzDaNaoTfQY3Ff2+u9Nn OAhn8lT/HmMJiJUTp4YeAVjzLIx+Nq2NrAqEoaIqER1sfGH5bh2oK5yiJ+mW/8cQ 4OBdcQXoXnDtyQvoT69EELq+vsm5nVi8ibb/msE9r9ImE2FJ+2mHKadFpluBGCnX xApAaxqkX4lPEphpysdlcq9GF1/eSyGRFM/3tDM/vefy9VokjhXHXAbZ2jhfSoTS PfWZpxi8sur3z/s/sIVaqMbLG8IdjOfoGKTgtzoYHVqvtlYxOubbvh52iI58CCL7 0LblkAeOSlk2UITYMV+yF3WB0naRjO41LngwwmxcJyRsJDvrzQkSEvhtWaJ9Qlh5 d/k6f2y/hDrpITLxf5C+I1/mg8WDtmgODczUTlSj+u6NCLMUT0onv5XdsEQXuGX6 7yFDEdLFjPEpGoMIBLO/ =dRlH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
