On 06/03/2014 06:46 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:26:48 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> Quick question though. What's the benefit of using '-1' there? So the >> package doesn't get added to the world list? Or are there some extra >> benefits? > That is more than sufficient benefit. Having upower-pm-utils in @world > could cause problems later on. For example, if you later decide to switch > to systemd, you'll get a blocker on upower because upower-pm-utils is in > @world. > > @world should contain only what YOU use, anything else is a dependency > and should be left to portage to handle. > > Understood. Thanks.
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils Tom Wijsman
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils J. Roeleveld
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils Peter Humphrey
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-u... J. Roeleveld
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-... Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils Samuli Suominen
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils Rich Freeman
- [gentoo-user] Re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils »Q«
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils Alexander Kapshuk
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils Neil Bothwick
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-u... Alexander Kapshuk
- Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils Samuli Suominen
- [gentoo-user] Re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils »Q«