Stefan G. Weichinger <lists <at> xunil.at> writes:
> >> Anyone playing with wayland already? > > > Not yet..... > > Closely related, is the QT5 approach to start experimenting. > > This might help [1] > > [1] http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWayland > hmm, thanks ... I am not sure how to apply this Most Desktops will be a while before interacting with Wayland, let alone supporting it natively, imho. Bloatware like gnome and KDE will be the last to get QT5, Wayland and a myriad of new, super_fast, secure desktop toys, imho. > You suggest that by running QtWayland I might be able to run gnome with > wayland? I don't 'gnome' or 'kde' anything anymore. Those bloated, security risks will be the last ones to support Wayland, imho. LXQT(5) is way ahead on Wayland, as they already have testing version of lxqt running on qt5 (grep this list archives for discussions). "LXQt Got Full Support For Qt5. Wayland Support Will Be Soon Added" http://linuxg.net/lxqt-got-full-support-for-qt5-wayland-support-will-be-soon-added/ Best to the site for help, as I'm not on the razor's edge with LXQT. I'm working on other stuff for a few more weeks...... Skinny (LXQT5) is the new "PHAT". Join the revolution. LXQT is up to 13 devs now. Project is 'on fire', so pull up a seat, and get roasted! hth, James
