Am 09.10.2014 um 21:38 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> On 09/10/2014 19:44, Francisco Ares wrote:
>> 2014-10-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:michaelkintz...@gmail.com>>:
>>
>> On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote:
>> > 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote:
>> > > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> > >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months,
>> > >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium.
>> > >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days
>> > >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though
>> > >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas)
>> > >
>> > > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq
>> > > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing?
>> >
>> > I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently
>> > after it refused to accept every URL as malformed.
>> > Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ;
>> > I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox.
>> > My window manager is Fluxbox.
>>
>> I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and
>> occasionally
>> as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use WebKit as its
>> browser engine instead of KHTML.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Mick
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How did you manage to get WebKit instead of KHTML? On my version, I can
>> only see the last.
>>
>> Thanks, and Best Regards,
>> Francisco
>
> I set this up so long ago I forget exactly how I did it. IIRC it's as
> simple as
>
> emerge kde-misc/kwebkitpart
> konqueror menu -> View -> View Mode
>
last time I tried webkit it broke websites in interessting ways.