Alan McKinnon <[email protected]> [14-11-29 07:32]: > On 29/11/2014 08:14, [email protected] wrote: > > > After your email I read the output of dmesg more precisely ... and now > > knowing (due to your post :) what to look for and found that > > the detection of another usb-ethernet-device attached to my PC created > > another usb<n> (first: usb0, second: usb1). > > > > I put the first Arietta into the net 192.168.10.x and the second > > Arietta into net 192.168.11.x and do two different ifconfig for usb0 > > and the other one for usb1 and TADA! - I could ssh into both! > > > > This is not THAT elegant (wasting a complete subnet), but it proofes, > > that both boards are /relly/ ok... > > > In truth you are not wasting a complete subnet (whatever that is), you > have merely specified a range 256 times larger than what you want to have. > > In networking you are not limited to ranges that end on an octet > boundary (we got rid of *that* limitation 10+ years ago). Instead just > do this: > > board #1: 192.168.0.100/32 > board #2: 192.168.0.101/32 > > Now you have specified "subnet" that are each exactly one ip address > wide. All modern software know what to do with this. > > Adapt the addresses to your own network design and you should be good to go. > > > > > Alan > > > -- > Alan McKinnon > [email protected] > >
Hi Alan, thanks a lot for that ! 8) Best regards, Meino
