Michael Vetter wrote: > Am 09/01/15 um 03:37 schrieb Dale: >> Jc García wrote: >>>> 2015-01-08 11:02 GMT-06:00 behrouz khosravi <bz.khosr...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> Hi. I was wondering that is it predictable that when qt5 and plasma 5 >>>>>> will >>>>>> be unmasked? >>>>>> >>>> Keep an eye on the bug-tracker for the unmasking of qt5[1] or hang >>>> around the #gentoo-qt irc channel[2] , there you can get first hand >>>> information, >>>> >>>> It's work that needs to be done, and usually developers work on their >>>> free time and bugs might keep arising, so prediction doesn't work. >>>> >>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454132 >>>> [2] irc://irc.gentoo.org/gentoo-qt >>>> >>>> >> On this topic, has anyone used qt5 and plasma 5 yet? Is it at least >> workable? I ask because I may give it a try unless people think it is >> to early yet. > I have encountered several Gentooers in #gentoo-qt and #gentoo-kde that > use it already. It seems to work, thought not perfectly. > > Some Ubuntu-using friends of mine use Qt5 on a daily basis without > problems, I wondered: what's different in Gentoo? > > cheers >
Could be compiler differences, USE flags etc. I may give it a shot. Just see what it looks like if nothing else. I just didn't want to step into water that was way over my head. ;-) Dale :-) :-)
