On 01/08/2015 09:37 PM, Dale wrote: > Jc García wrote: >> 2015-01-08 11:02 GMT-06:00 behrouz khosravi <bz.khosr...@gmail.com>: >>> Hi. I was wondering that is it predictable that when qt5 and plasma 5 will >>> be unmasked? >>> >> Keep an eye on the bug-tracker for the unmasking of qt5[1] or hang >> around the #gentoo-qt irc channel[2] , there you can get first hand >> information, >> >> It's work that needs to be done, and usually developers work on their >> free time and bugs might keep arising, so prediction doesn't work. >> >> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454132 >> [2] irc://irc.gentoo.org/gentoo-qt >> >> > > On this topic, has anyone used qt5 and plasma 5 yet? Is it at least > workable? I ask because I may give it a try unless people think it is > to early yet. > > Thanks. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > >
I've been using it on my machine for a few months now actually. In the beginning there were tons of ups and downs as it got stabilized, but it's been pretty smooth lately. There are definitely some kinks that still need to be worked out, and there are only a couple k-applications that have been updated to work with the new frameworks (unless you're willing to go with the live ebuilds). I'd wait till plasma 5.2 is released, or at least in beta. I've heard that a lot of bugs will be ironed out then. Though if you're curious, it's completely usable right now, nothing is currently on fire on my computer!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
