Alan McKinnon wrote: > I've gotten to the point where I can make sense of portage output (it > took a while!) but I have no idea how to explain how I do it :-) > Portage makes a very fundamental blunder - it exposes the underlying > implementation in the output. The odds are very slim the average user > will ever make reasonable sense of it.
You prolly got good at it because of so many people on here asking what those crpytic messages are saying. Very few people can figure out what they are trying to say. Every once in a while, I get lucky and can keyword a package or something and get past a blocker but sometimes, it may as well spit out Greek characters. What gets me on this one, it really didn't give a clue what the real problem is. If it did, I missed it. I just wonder, is there some way they can make emerge spit out something that makes sense or is that something that can not be done? Dale :-) :-)
