Mick <michaelkintzios <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Back to the OP's question, I don't think that Google (or the rest) are 
> trying to *control* the way we live, but can definitely influence it.
> PS.  I marked this as [O/T] because the words gentoo, portage, emerge, 
> et al. did not appear once so far.  :-p


The Onion might not give us "nation state level security" but it really
does help. I think if you mix in a few system that run off of a livedvd
(or usbstick with persistence) you can build a network that most vendors,
interlopers and pecker-heads cannot penetrate. The trick is to figure
out a quick moving onion, where a group of folks build-use-teardown
on a weekly if not shorter basis. I'd be willing to participate
with a few folks on building and testing, say a gentoo-onion within
TOR, if any other have interest.

The TOR-ramdisk looks promising for this [1]
http://opensource.dyc.edu/tor-ramdisk. Once my cluster stuff stabalizes, one
of the things
I want to experiment with is running hundreds of Tor-ramdisk
on  a large cluster. If they do not live long, it's hard to complain
about private and limited channels...... How to best syncronize with
an out-of-band approach is something that needs extra thought. A physically
distinct channel to pass new cryptokeys around is limited and challenging.


James

[1] http://opensource.dyc.edu/tor-ramdisk







Reply via email to