Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon <at> gmail.com> writes:
> The don't use it, grub:0 still works just fine It's all working fine (atm). But changes are problematic, or at least they have been in the past > I gave grub-2 a try earlier this week and once again couldn;t figure out > how to install that mini-OS that bootstraps a boot loader which > bootstraps a boot loader which loads code that loads a kernel. So back > to grub:0 for me I do not really want to go to back to grub-legacy. I do not what to be bound to (u)efi booting either. You could just lie to me and make us both happy? Most safe (least hassle):: I guess I should just mask it and stay on:: sys-boot/grub- 2.02_beta2-r3 It's been fine even with multiple kernel updates........... James
