On Tuesday 21 July 2015 19:06:10 [email protected] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21 2015, Jc García wrote:
> > 2015-07-21 14:23 GMT-06:00  <[email protected]>:
> >> Probably the --unmerge would have worked.  But I basically started over
> >> (untar of the stage3) and applied canek two-step recipe
> >> 
> >>    First switch to the systemd profile and emerge world
> >>    Second switch to the gnome/system profile and emerge gnome
> >> 
> >> It worked well.
> > 
> > I guess It worked for you well, that's nice, I just want to add you
> > shouldn't have taken Kanek's description as a full recipe, he didn't
> > wrote it but, doing the systemd, and stardard install configuration
> > before emerging gnome, is importat for many users, especially if en_US
> > is not your native language[1], and you want to reduce the amount of
> > to compile/install packages by settings like VIDEO_CARDS,
> > INPUT_DEVICES, etc .
> > 
> > Again nice you had the default configuration match want you wanted.
> 
> Canek didn't call it a full recipe; he just said it was what he usually
> does.  Perhaps I should have chosen my words more carefully.

I don't think so. It was clear enough to me.

But this conversation touches on a more general point: which profile is best at 
each stage of an installation? I've had to rebuild my KDE system a few times 
recently (at least I thought I did at the time, but that's another story). I 
settled on a vanilla profile in the early stages, with USE=-X  in make.conf, 
then changed it to +X and installed xorg-server. Then I switched to the KDE 
desktop profile and installed KDE, finally adding all the bits and pieces that 
go to make up a complete system. Last of all, an emerge -e world tidied 
everything up neatly.

The installation handbook could be clearer on this.

-- 
Rgds
Peter


Reply via email to