On 11/07/2015 02:52 PM, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 08/11/15 05:22, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> On 11/05/2015 11:06 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>>> You might be right, maybe I'll add one HDD for backup (good suggestion).
>>>> The killer is my 1TB SSD $499.99CAD
>>>
>>> Get 1 SSD for the OS, software and your home directory. (240GB is usually 
>>> enough)
>>> And 1 big HDD for your data.
>>>
>>> Keep your documents and other data out of the home directory if doing this.
>>> Reason I suggest your home directory on SSD is because programs tend to 
>>> store 
>>> a lot in your home directory which can benefit from a faster disk.
>>
>> It seems to me that SSD drives are slower than standard spinning disks.
>> I was just comparing my two disk with hdparm
>>
>> 1.) Western Digital model:  Model=WDC WD2002FAEX-007BA0
>>  hdparm -Tt /dev/sda
>>
>> /dev/sda:
>>  Timing cached reads:   9406 MB in  2.00 seconds = 4705.88 MB/sec
>>  Timing buffered disk reads: 432 MB in  3.00 seconds = 143.92 MB/sec
>>
>> 2.) Intel SSD model Model=INTEL SSDSC2BF480A5
>> /dev/sda:
>>  Timing cached reads:   1292 MB in  2.00 seconds = 645.51 MB/sec
>>  Timing buffered disk reads: 536 MB in  3.00 seconds = 178.63 MB/sec
>>
>> It seems to me the spinning disk WD is faster than my Intel SSD
>> So is there an advantage of overpaying for SSD?
>>
>> --
>> Thelma
>>
> 
> olympus ~ # hdparm -tT /dev/sda
> 
> /dev/sda:
>  Timing cached reads:   20442 MB in  1.99 seconds = 10278.90 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads: 1164 MB in  3.00 seconds = 387.66 MB/sec
> olympus ~ # hdparm -tT /dev/sdb
> 
> /dev/sdb:
>  Timing cached reads:   20320 MB in  1.99 seconds = 10218.13 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads: 300 MB in  3.00 seconds =  99.88 MB/sec
> olympus ~ #
> 
> 
> Something is not right with your system ...
> 
> sda is an older intel ssd, sdb is a western digital red which somethimes
> gets close to that your speed.
> 
> try multiple measurements, no load on the system.

I did run test several times, still get the same numbers. Maybe the
reason is that one system is much smaller slower.

The SSD is running on smaller box: Atom-TM-_CPU_330_@_1.60GHz
The WD is bitter unit: AMD_FX-tm-8150_Eight-Core_Processor

--
Thelma

Reply via email to