Dear Grant,

I would sincerely second Openbox + tint2.
That's my all times favourite. Bear in mind that the stable
tint2wizard/conf doesn't handle the Launcher properly.
For that you need to emerge tint2 with the testing "~amd64" flag :).
There are some additional goodies in the more modern tint2 panel, too.

Best regards,
Andy

On 29 September 2016 at 21:52, Grant Edwards <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 2016-09-25, Grant Edwards <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> I liked openbox though, so if LXDE refuses to handle multiple
> >> screens I may stick with openbox and try to find some other panel
> >> program that does work with multiple screens.
>
> I gave up on LXDE.  I messed around with it a bit more and it seems to
> have a hard-wired assumption that computers are single-user and
> single-screen.  Besides that, the LXDE community also seems to be
> rather small/inactive. I posted questions about multi-screen use to
> the LXDE forum, but the user forum only has a couple of posts per
> month, and few of them ever get any responses.
>
> > Openbox+tint2 looks promising.
>
> That's what I've settled on.  It took a couple hours of fiddling to
> setup a startup script, configure the panels, the window manager
> itself, and build a root window menu that's close enough to my old one
> that I don't flail about like Donald Trump making fun of the
> handicapped.
>
> For generating an openbox root menu, I recommend obmenu-generator.
>
> > I still have to figure out one last tweak to openbox's behavior.  When
> > you do ctrl-alt-right/left it switches virtual desktops on the screen
> > that has input focus, and I want it to switch on the screen where the
> > mouse pointer is.  I know it's trivial, and all you have to do is
> > click before hitting ctrl-alt-right/left.
>
> I haven't figured that out yet, so I'll have to adapt. :)
>
> --
> Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Does someone from
>                                   at               PEORIA have a SHORTER
>                               gmail.com            ATTENTION span than me?
>
>
>

Reply via email to