>> "Swapping excessively" is inherently a use-case-specific problem, but it 
>> comes
>> down to two questions:
>>
>> * Do you notice your system spending time in iowait swapping data in while
>> you're waiting on it?
>> * Do you notice your system spending time in iowait swapping data out while
>> you're waiting on it? (I.e. as it tries to make room for new memory
>> allocations)


I just ran sar from the sysstat package and this looks like a lot of
iowait to me:

00:00:02        CPU     %user     %nice   %system   %iowait    %steal     %idle
00:10:01        all     48.11      0.86      0.83      1.38      0.00     48.82
00:20:01        all     43.98      0.85      0.64      0.54      0.00     53.99
00:30:01        all     48.17      0.90      1.04      0.82      0.00     49.07
00:40:01        all     48.69      0.85      1.06      0.48      0.00     48.92
00:50:01        all     49.74      0.87      0.58      0.49      0.00     48.33
01:00:01        all     46.21      0.85      0.48      0.41      0.00     52.05
01:10:01        all     48.10      0.86      0.79      0.61      0.00     49.64
01:20:01        all     54.00      0.86      0.60      0.65      0.00     43.89
01:30:01        all     45.81      0.85      0.49      0.49      0.00     52.36
01:40:01        all     52.04      0.86      0.56      0.56      0.00     45.99
01:50:01        all     48.49      0.85      0.52      0.47      0.00     49.66
02:00:01        all     43.18      0.85      0.48      0.50      0.00     54.99
02:10:01        all     45.48      1.12      1.74     20.65      0.00     31.01
02:20:02        all     46.20     10.22      1.97      9.70      0.00     31.90
02:30:01        all     64.93      0.88      1.98     12.54      0.00     19.67
02:40:01        all     46.24      0.86      0.93      5.08      0.00     46.90
02:50:01        all     43.49      0.85      0.45      0.60      0.00     54.60
03:00:01        all     43.28      0.85      0.45      0.45      0.00     54.97
03:10:01        all     39.58      0.85      0.81      5.22      0.00     53.54
03:20:01        all     42.04      0.91      0.72      3.97      0.00     52.35
03:30:01        all     46.60      0.85      0.74      0.49      0.00     51.31
03:40:01        all     47.30      0.85      0.82      0.82      0.00     50.22
03:50:01        all     49.43      0.85      0.84      0.59      0.00     48.29
04:00:01        all     45.50      0.85      1.02      0.71      0.00     51.91
04:10:01        all     44.35      0.86      1.13      2.32      0.00     51.35
04:20:01        all     44.29      0.85      1.17      4.91      0.00     48.77
04:30:01        all     42.69      0.85      0.47      1.41      0.00     54.59
04:40:01        all     48.22      0.85      1.00      7.23      0.00     42.70
04:50:01        all     44.70      0.86      0.49      1.49      0.00     52.45
Average:        all     46.92      1.19      0.86      2.95      0.00     48.08


> If I do find a correlation between iowait and web server response
> times, should I just decrease memory usage until the problem goes
> away?
>
> What I do notice is that my web server's response time increases along
> with the swapping peaks in the graph I posted before.
>
>
>> There are ways other than swap to find yourself in iowait, though. I wonder
>> what might a good metric of combining iowait numbers with swap event counts.
>> Swap events without iowait are likely imperceptible.


I do see a clear correlation between iowait above and swap in on the
munin graph.  Is that enough to conclude that swap activity is slowing
down the system and I need to reduce memory usage or perhaps tune
swappiness?

- Grant

Reply via email to