On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:28:15 -0500, Michael Mol wrote: > The next tool that looked like it might work, gscan2pdf, wasn't in > portage, and with the semi-garbled output from tesseract suggesting the > scans were too poor quality, I didn't pursue further.
THere's an ebuild on bgo that I've kept updated to the latest release, I've attached it. However, it uses tesseract as the OCR engine, so I would expect similar results. -- Neil Bothwick Do Roman paramedics refer to IV's as "4's"?
gscan2pdf-1.5.5.ebuild
Description: Binary data
pgpa1iohJbryv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
