On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:53:47 +0100, lee wrote:

> > I would imagine because it cannot be used without some initial
> > configuration. The default provides the greatest reliability out of
> > the box, at the expense of less readable (which is not the same as
> > unrecognisable, a value judgement you are imposing on the names)
> > names.  
> 
> I call them unrecognisable because they are hard to recognise, as in
> hard to read and impossible to remember.  I find that annoying.  I can
> call them "annoying names" if you prefer that :)

I do, or "difficult to remember" or "cryptic", but they are not
unrecognisable - except to those that wish them to be.
 
> > There is nothing wrong with wanting things to work as you do, but it
> > requires input to do so. It you have to start editing files to make it
> > work properly, there is little point in making it the default.  
> 
> Right, and it could work without editing files manually.  A
> configuration file assigning editable names to the annoying names could
> be created automatically and filled by assigning the name an interface
> already has to it (because when it has a name, the name is known, which
> is easier than trying to make up all possible names in advance).  Then
> only if you wanted you would edit the configuration file to assign the
> name(s) of your choosing, and if you don't want to do that, you simply
> get the names you get now.  There would be no change to how the names
> are now, only an additional option.
> 
> That would also have the advantage that when the annoying name of an
> interface changes, you can choose to either adjust all configuration
> files in which you have specified a particular interface or simply
> adjust the one configuration file that assigns the names.
> 
> I actually wonder why they didn't virtualise the names.  It makes too
> much sense for not to do it, and you could do likewise with other
> devices (especially disks).

That's a reasonable approach, and you could have the ebuild set it up
with a USE flag. All it takes is for someone that cares enough about it
to do something.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

I have seen the truth, and it makes no sense.

Attachment: pgpi_cPQaXuTe.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to