On 31/12/2016 17:23, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> and the novice asked:
> "Is there the Tao in rpm?"
> The master replied: "...ues, there is the Tao in rpm."
> "And is there the Tao in yum?"
> "Yes, there is Tao in yym also...in every package manager
> is the Tao...humble and silent they do all their work..."
> The master added:
> "...and Tao is in portage/emerge also...but of an higher order,
> so dont try to understand, what it says..."
> 
> This time the novice was who shifted slightly and coughed...
> 
> Hmmm...
> 
> This time portage reached down from its ebony tower and spake to the
> novice claiming:
> 
> emerge sci-electronics/pulseview sci-electronics/sigrok-cli 
> sci-libs/libsigrok sci-libs/libsigrokdecode
> 
> Calculating dependencies                          [ ok ]                      
>                                                             -
> 
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for sci-electronics/pulseview              
>                             ... done!
> 
> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sci-electronics/pulseview" has unmet 
> requirements.
> - sci-electronics/pulseview-0.3.0::gentoo USE="decode qt5 -qt4 -static" 
> ABI_X86="64" PYTHON_TARGETS="-python3_4"
> 
>   The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied:
>     decode? ( python_targets_python3_4 )
> 
>   The above constraints are a subset of the following complete expression:
>     decode? ( python_targets_python3_4 ) exactly-one-of ( qt4 qt5 )
> 
> 
> What is missing what by what ?
> Is it possible to make these kind of output a little more readable...?
> I am only a simple human being and my ideas for more and more clones
> of "The Tao of Programming" just to add some humor are limited...
> :)
> 
> Ah! By the way: Happy new year! :) :) :)
> 
> Cheers
> Meino
> (slightly shifting and coughing)
> 



You have "PYTHON_TARGETS=-python3_4" set for pulseview

You need to make it PYTHON_TARGETS=python3_4

Add python_single_target_python3_4 to package.use for pulseview in the
usual way

-- 
Alan McKinnon
[email protected]


Reply via email to