On 02/02/2017 01:57 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 02/02/2017 10:49 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> On 02/02/2017 01:36 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 10:47:48AM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote >>> >>>> On gcc-4.8.5 on my system boost-1.62.0-r1 was failing as well >>>> I switched to gcc-4.9.3 and it emerges just fine. >>> >>> I see that you still haven't fully upgraded your system. Looking at >>> my /usr/portage/seys-devel/gcc subdirectory, the date stamps on the >>> ebuilds are... >>> >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 1408 Dec 28 2015 gcc-4.8.5.ebuild >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 1408 Jun 21 2016 gcc-4.9.3.ebuild >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 1408 Dec 20 11:36 gcc-4.9.4.ebuild >>> >>> gcc-4.9.4 is the current default stable version, as of Dec 20th. >> >> Yes, I have this gcc-4.9.4 but prefer older stable branch; if I'll be >> experiencing some compilation problems I'll switch to 4.9.4 :-) > > 4.8 is not "older" actually. It's ancient :-P
gcc-stable = 'If it ain't broke, don't fix it' That is why I switched to 9.4.3 -- Thelma
