On Donnerstag, 9. März 2017 22:50:26 CET Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:23:34 +0100, Marc Joliet wrote: > > On Donnerstag, 9. März 2017 21:08:32 CET Rich Freeman wrote: > > > I guess all it is missing is an MTA. :) > > > > Heh, maybe then systemd would be able to send emails for failed > > services ;-) . > > Like this? > > http://northernlightlabs.se/systemd.status.mail.on.unit.failure
Ah, but with a built-in MTA that would work out-of-the-box, in which case the unit-status-mail@.service unit (or something like it) could be included upstream ;-) . (Of course, as somebody who doesn't currently need failure emails, I don't *really* care about this topic, although I was vaguely aware of the method described in your link.) -- Marc Joliet -- "People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don't" - Bjarne Stroustrup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
