Thomas Mueller wrote: > You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except > one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where > multipart/alternative went through. > > I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by > default, and might design an email client to not support > multipart/alternative at all in composed messages. > > Tom >
Someone pointed out that it likely did that with that message because the message I was replying to was HTML. It seems that if I reply to a HTML message, it ignores my settings. I think it should obey the settings regardless myself as settings should override what it is replying too. At least I know that messages by default are being sent correctly. That should correct the vast majority of them. Thanks again to all. Dale :-) :-)
