On Friday, 25 August 2017 08:21:53 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:12:52 PM CEST Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > [3] In this case, I'd be willing to
> > s/pain/enormous amounts of pain, on shaming youtube video/g
>
> Don't forget to share the link to that video...
>
> --
> Joost
It'll go viral! :-)
Meanwhile, here's an example of the sort of MSWindows mailers I was talking
about. It states it's multipart, OK nothing wrong with that. Then,
supposedly the text/plain follows, or ... does it?!
================================================
Subject: Confirmation of your order: A3338348521
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_3229_1398402695.1503664073222"
X-ATG-MailingId: 374481625
------=_Part_3229_1398402695.1503664073222
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
/* Client-specific Styles */ #outlook a { padding: 0; } /* Force
Outlook to provide a "view in browser" menu link. */ body { width:
100% !important; -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%; -ms-text-size-adjust:
100%; margin: 0; padding: 0; background-color: #fbfbfb; } /* Prevent
Webkit and Windows Mobile platforms from changing default font sizes,
while not breaking desktop design. */ .ExternalClass { width: 100%; }
/* Force Hotmail to display emails at full width */
===================================================
Seriously? Outlook needs all this formatting just to display plain text? o_O
I bet Windows Live (or whatever it's called this semester) will show it just
fine. :-p
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
