On 2018-02-13 03:13, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

> Apparently, and contrary to what people (me included) wrote here in
> the past, BPF JIT is the secure option, and the interpreter is the
> insecure one.

Do you have a reference for this?  It sounds strange indeed.

Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.

Reply via email to