On 2018-02-13 03:13, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Apparently, and contrary to what people (me included) wrote here in > the past, BPF JIT is the secure option, and the interpreter is the > insecure one.
Do you have a reference for this? It sounds strange indeed. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.
