Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 5 May 2019 21:22:16 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> This package has been in the rebuild list for about a month or longer.
>> I kept thinking at some point I would sync and there would be a fix but
>> since it has been a while, maybe it is just me. Below is the error from
>> a little ways before error 1. It should be enough but if the rest is
>> needed, I will be glad to post it or email it off list, since it does
>> have some size to it. Just let me know what is needed.
> The first occurrence of "error" in here is when it returns from error 1,
> so the preceding lines are probably from a parallel job that was still
> running after the error occurred.
>
> Try emerging it with MAKEOPTS="-j1" so you only see the output from the
> problem area at the end of the log.
>
>
Well, trying that was worth a shot anyway. Sometimes it does fix some
problems, although it might still be a bug. However, in this case, I
don't think anything really changed. It looks like the same error
again. I copied, going backwards, from the error 1, first mention of
it, and then went back up about 70 lines or so. One may want to read it
from bottom to top. Honestly, I can't see that anything failed but
something seems to have failed, somewhere. Here is the error while
running with -j1:
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:2660:15:
warning: implicit declaration of function ‘SCM_INUM’; did you mean
‘SCM_INUM0’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
ret.flags = SCM_INUM (SCM_CADR (entry));
^~~~~~~~
SCM_INUM0
In file included from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkobject.h:37,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkwidget.h:36,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkcontainer.h:35,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkbin.h:35,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkwindow.h:36,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkdialog.h:35,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkaboutdialog.h:32,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtk.h:33,
from
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:26:
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:
In function ‘sgtk_find_object_info_from_type’:
/usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtktypeutils.h:243:31: warning: passing
argument 1 of ‘sgtk_find_object_info’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from
pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
#define gtk_type_name(type) g_type_name (type)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:2688:33:
note: in expansion of macro ‘gtk_type_name’
return sgtk_find_object_info (gtk_type_name (type));
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:2678:19:
note: expected ‘char *’ but argument is of type ‘const gchar *’ {aka
‘const char *’}
sgtk_object_info *sgtk_find_object_info (char *name);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:
In function ‘sgtk_gtk_object_new’:
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:2895:3:
warning: ‘g_object_newv’ is deprecated: Use
'g_object_new_with_properties' instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
obj = g_object_newv (type, n_params, params);
^~~
In file included from /usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gbinding.h:29,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib-object.h:23,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/gioenums.h:28,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/giotypes.h:28,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/gio.h:26,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdkapplaunchcontext.h:30,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdk.h:32,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtk.h:32,
from
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:26:
/usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gobject.h:428:13: note: declared here
gpointer g_object_newv (GType object_type,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:
In function ‘sgtk_signal_emit’:
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:3090:31:
warning: passing argument 1 of ‘scm_cons’ makes pointer from integer
without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
scm_cons (scm_makfrom0str (name), SCM_EOL));
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/guile/2.2/libguile.h:81,
from
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:30:
/usr/include/guile/2.2/libguile/pairs.h:130:15: note: expected ‘SCM’
{aka ‘struct scm_unused_struct *’} but argument is of type ‘int’
scm_cons (SCM x, SCM y)
~~~~^
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:
In function ‘sgtk_init_substrate’:
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:3251:3:
warning: ‘g_mem_chunk_new’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
sgtk_protshell_chunk = g_mem_chunk_create (sgtk_protshell, 128,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h:106,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gbinding.h:28,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib-object.h:23,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/gioenums.h:28,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/giotypes.h:28,
from /usr/include/glib-2.0/gio/gio.h:26,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdkapplaunchcontext.h:30,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdk.h:32,
from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtk.h:32,
from
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:26:
/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gallocator.h:43:17: note: declared
here
GMemChunk * g_mem_chunk_new (const gchar *name,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:
In function ‘sgtk_scm2list’:
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:1798:6:
warning: ignoring return value of ‘g_list_concat’, declared with
attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
g_list_concat (tail, n);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.1-r3/work/guile-gtk-2.1/guile-gtk.c:1818:8:
warning: ignoring return value of ‘g_list_concat’, declared with
attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
g_list_concat (tail, n);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [Makefile:458: gtk-glue.lo] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
Does that look any different to you? I can either send the whole thing
off list or attach the whole thing if you want. Just met me know. I
would think, especially with -j1, that it should be in the very last few
lines myself.
Ideas? Thanks.
Dale
:-) :-)
