On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:35:41 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> My temporary solution, I pointed it to a small directory that only > >> has a couple dozen images in it. That seems to work.
> > Is there a difference in the metadata of these few images compared > > with the rest in the whole directory? > > It's actually a small directory of the exact same images. I might add, > the clock does skip a second or so when I add them so I suspect it > performs the same action, it just has a much smaller number of them. > It's hard to say. Point being, I'm using the same images as before, > just a smaller sub-directory. Have you tried using the smaller directory and then addng a few (hundred) images at a time, letting the scan finish and then repeating. I wonder is plasma is using a new method of caching the data, or the old cache got corrupted, so it has to reindex the whole directory again. It's never had to do 150000+ files in one go before because the directory has grown organically. Now, for whatever reason, it seems like it is trying to do the whole lot in one hit. -- Neil Bothwick I'd tell you a UDP joke, but you may not get it.
pgpepvr8DfIPz.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
