On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the > same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code. > > This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened? Did > something go wrong in the emerge process? There's no sign of any > attackers.
They are always the same since net.eth0 (and all other net.<interface>)
is a symlink to net.lo.
Cheers,
Renat
--
Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise loesen,
durch die sie entstanden sind.
(Einstein)
pgpEx5LcJ3pth.pgp
Description: PGP signature
