I agree with your reasons but some of the others have reasons too.  I do like my reason better though.  LOL  I put LOL for those who read text only and not HTML.  LOL, again.

I don't think anybody is getting anal about it.  I always look at it this way, if someone doesn't want to help me with something, I don't want their help anyway.   I help because I like it not because someone has a gun to my head, or top posts.  If someone bottom posts, I'll scroll down and see if I can help.

I do wish someone would pick a way and let it be the only way though.  It gets confusing when some top post and some bottom post.  That really wears out my mouse wheel.  Go down, read a bit, then go up and read a bit, then back down again, repeat, repeat.  That is when it gets confusing.

Dale
:-)

Ryan Viljoen wrote:
Ok if he is getting anal about whether I reply on the top or on the
bottom then tough luck. It makes more sense to me that it is on the
top since:
a) you dont need to scroll
b) if you have been following the thread then you know whats been said
already and if you cant remember you can scroll down to read the
message.
c) the only time i will do it in reverse is when quoting what has been said.

END!

On 10/30/05, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
My reply being on top of what you wrote.  Some people like it on the
bottom.  I guess someone will be upset no matter which way you do it.  I
just like the top so that I don't have to scroll down.  My mouse wheel
leaves a little to be desired.

Dale

Ryan Viljoen wrote:

    
Is that better? And while we are on the matter what is top posting?



      
--
[email protected] mailing list


    


--
"When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just
stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, for
free". - Linus Torvalds, 1995

  

Reply via email to