Am Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 02:08:29PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > <<<SNIP>>> > > With each generation, the architecture becomes more efficient, meaning more > > instructions per cycle, lower consumption and so on. The max frequency is > > not really the driving force behind performance increase anymore due to > > efficiency issues at higher frequencies. > > > > Here are some benchmark comparisons from cpubenchmark.net: > > > > Processor year power cores single-core score multi-core score > > FX-8350 2012 125 W 8/8 1580 6026 > > i5-4590 2014 84 W 4/4 2086 5356 > > i5-10400 2020 65 W 6/12 2580 12258 > > R3 4300G 2020 65 W 4/8 2557 11017 > > R5 5600G 2021 65 W 6/12 3185 19892 > > R5 7600X 2022 145 W 6/12 4213 28753 > > > > Sources: > > https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html#desktop-thread > > https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+FX-8350+Eight-Core&id=1780 > > https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-4590+%40+3.30GHz&id=2234 > > https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i5-10400+%40+2.90GHz&id=3737 > > https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+3+4300G&id=3808 > > https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+5600G&id=4325 > > https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+5+7600X&id=5033 > > […] > > It's been a while. I been getting some things ready for garden time and > a few spring projects as well. I looked at a few lists of CPU > processors. This is a bit pricey but I may try to buy a AMD Ryzen 9 > 5900X 12-Core @ 3.7 GHz. It has 4 more cores but clock speed is a > little slower. Even just comparing number of cores and the fairly close > clock speed, that alone should make it a bit faster. Add in that they > make them run code more efficiently now, should be a good bit better. I > usually try to aim for 4 or 5 times more processing power. I suspect > this may help with encryption as well since newer CPUs have extra code > just for that on there now. Most of the mobos also handle a lot more > memory as well. I have 32GBs now. Most support 64GB and I think I saw > a 128GB version somewhere. > > Just comparing CPU to CPU, what would you expect as far as increase in > speed? I'm not expecting a exact number, just curious as to how much > difference I could reasonably expect.
Since I personally don’t have any experience with high-performance contemporary CPUs and can’t remember all those reviews I read in my newsfeed from time to time, I tend to visit benchmark sites like the aforementioned cpubenchmark.net. Those provide comparable numbers of synthetic and/or real-world benchmarks for both single- and multi-core use cases. The Phoronix Test Suite is another notable name, and also very linux-centric. I haven’t used that one myself yet, but have a look and click around: https://openbenchmarking.org/suites/pts It’s open source, so you can run it on your own machine to get comparison numbers. -- Grüße | Greetings | Salut | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. If the cops arrest a mime, do they tell her she has the right to remain silent?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
