On Wednesday 16 November 2005 21:12, Nick Rout wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:20:36 -0500 > > Derek Tracy wrote: > > Part way through the online handbook I noticed that > > they standardized the Stage3 install. I figured that since the developers > > thought it was best to use a Stage3 install then why not give it a shot. > > I read your message and was surprised at this. Last time I read the > handbooks the Handbook gave stage 1/2/3 options and the 2005.1 handbook > stuck to stage 3. (Talking x86 here, I have never done an instal on > other architectures). > > Now, like you, I read this in the Handbook: > > "Make sure you download a stage3 tarball - installations using a stage1 or > stage2 tarball are not supported anymore."
To be honest, this is the first time i see this. I always did stage 1 installs. Haven't done so in a while that's why I'm a little surprised about this. What exactly were the reasons for such a move?
pgpFcARz5HFlg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
