I have used both versions. The compiled version seems to be more stable on my
system.
Uwe
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
It's likely to take somewhere around 8-11 hours on such a machine. It
took somewhere around 10 hours for me on a 1500 MHz Athlon XP with 1 GB
RAM.
Whether or not you can benefit from compiling is unknown to me. But it's
more fun ;)
-
Kristian Poul Herkild
begin:vcard
fn:Uwe Klosa
n:Klosa;Uwe
org:Uppsala University;Electronic Publishing Centre
adr:;;;Uppsala;;75120;Sweden
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+46 (0)18 471 7658
url:http://publications.uu.se/epcentre
version:2.1
end:vcard
