On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Neil Bothwick wrote: > > >On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote: > > > >> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed > >> > >>>that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and > >>>`emerge -av gentoo-sources`. And it wants to rebuild my 2.6.13-r3 > >> > >>Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ? > >>I mean, "u" for "update"? > > > > > >It doesn't matter, because kernels arer slotted. > > > >Have you synced? It doesn't matter if the package is stable in Gentoo's > >portage tree if you sill have the old ebuild. > > > > > Yup. Did it today just to check before sending the first post. > (Mentioned this in the first post.) > > - -- > gentux > echo "hfouvyAdpy/ofu" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge' > > gentux's gpg fingerprint ==> 34CE 2E97 40C7 EF6E EC40 9795 2D81 924A > 6996 0993 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFD9N/rLYGSSmmWCZMRAvQ5AJ91CTrPnIUY2K9h2nGuzez5TvnnowCeO5qn > feaYzfHUzeioWHhZCuUmbMY= > =h/GC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > >
I've run out of ideas, if I do the same process as you did, I get the latest kernel, simply as that... Rebuild your portage tree?! (note: that can hurt more than it can solve) -- Daniel da Veiga Computer Operator - RS - Brazil -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V- PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
