Sven Köhler wrote:
>> Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then,
>> I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because
>> the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8:
>
> .UTF-8 changed from .utf8?
Yep.
> That's not true.
Wrong, it is.
> My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) never
> creates such locales.
There's no such flag as "userlocales".
> I also looked it up on a Redhat-System: no .UTF-8 locales.
Well.
> What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales?
2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1
Alexander Skwar
--
QOTD:
"If I'm what I eat, I'm a chocolate chip cookie."
--
[email protected] mailing list
