On Friday 29 December 2006 18:50, Mark M wrote:
> On 12/29/06, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2006-12-29, Mark M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > how about media-sound/audacious ?
> > > its a nice and lightweight player.
> >
> > Lightweight??
> >
> > It's the biggest virtual memory user on my system with a
> > virtial set size of 58M and resident set size of 14M.  The only
> > thing with a slightly larger resident size is the X server.
> >
> > Audacious takes three times as much memory as Apache.

PID   USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
10124 michael   15   0  113m  30m  22m R  0.5  4.9   0:02.38 amarokapp

and that's when it's not playing anything!  When streaming the %CPU goes up to 
8.5-9.0.

I'm missing xmms too.  I hope xmms2 will eventually be developed enough to use 
as a stable package, but without the bloatware that winamp has become.

-- 
Regards,
Mick

Attachment: pgpvV9tFaL59P.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to