070826 Aaron Clark wrote:
> On 20-Aug-07, at 3:06 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
>> (1bd) The mobo listed is described on the ASUS site under 'VGA' as
>>   "Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3100
>>   integrated High-definition video processing
>>   with maximum resolution 2048 x 1536 bpp @ 75 Hz ;
>>   maximum shared memory 256 MB ; supports OpenGL 1.5, Pixel Shader 2.0 ".
>> It appears that with this mobo I don't need a separate graphics card
>> unless I want very high-performance gaming or similar;
>> also, it uses open-source drivers (can anyone confirm?).
> I've only had experience with the Intel GMA 950, which Lspci lists
> as "Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller":
> it's worked fantastic for me so far with the opensource driver 
> on a Fedora 7 box.  In xorg.conf, the driver is "intel" instead of "i810";
> iirc the "intel" driver is newer
> and has better support for the newer chipsets.

I've taken a further look around & this deserves a new thread.
Thanks for this info, which is also very useful.

> OTOH, I do have a couple of words of caution about the Motherboard.
> The new Intel chipsets do not provide an IDE controller
> so motherboard manufacturers have to go get a 3rd party IDE/PATA controller
> if they want that support on their Intel motherboards.

My new HDD wb SATA : does that need an IDE controller ?
There wb a DVD/CD-RW drive too : perhaps that might need one ?
It's not an issue I've encountered before.

> Most of the manufacturers seem to have gone with JMicron's controller,
> but my experience with it so far has been  rather frustrating.
> Supposedly its drivers have been in the mainline kernel since 2.6.18
> but it's been pretty flaky for me when I had to deal with it
>
> Your motherboard has a "Marvell 88E8056® PCI-E Gigabit LAN controller",
> mine is a "Marvell 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller"
> but they'll both be using the sky2 driver likely.  Once again,
> it's been mostly functional but not perfect and sometimes a little flaky.
> My file server was using this and I ended up switching over 
> to the other onboard NIC (forcedeth driver) after discovering
> it was flaking out something in the network stack on multi-gig transfers.
> You should be able to deal with both chipsets, but just be prepared
> for a little bit of extra effort to get them working perfectly.

I'm unlikely to be transferring data in chunks of that size
& my machine won't be part of a network.
The ASUS mobos I've had have always been very trouble-free.

> 1 GB memory seems a little low to me long-term.

I'll certainly add another 1 GB later if needed,
but hopefully the price will have dropped by then.

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to