On Friday 07 December 2007 18:58:57 Alexander Skwar wrote: > > You are right except for the fact that virtual/mta will not be converted > > any time soon (if ever). Old style virtuals allow their providers to > > block all other providers by blocking the virtual. This isn't possible > > with the current format for new style virtuals so it isn't going to > > happen. editor didn't need that feature and thus could easily be > > converted... > > Ah, okay. Pretty bad situation, though, isn't it? I mean, > with the way it is now, we've got some virtuals which > work with virtuals and some, which don't. Do you happen > to know, if there's a bug which should rectify this > broken situation?
If by 'broken' you mean 'inconsistent' then I can assure you that there are plenty of much more important bugs open... ;) But I guess bug #148251 should be of interest in reference to virtual/mta. Personally I happen to hate old style virtuals and want them dead asap. As you can see on the bug there's not much indicating that'll happen anytime soon though.. -- Bo Andresen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
