On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 16:31 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200 > > > > Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: > > > > Dale wrote: > > > > | Chris Brennan wrote: > > > > |> How come I don't see my own posts to this list? > > > > | > > > > | We got this one. I saw one other one too. > > > > | Dale > > > > | > > > > | :-) :-) > > > > > > > > Ya but you didn't answer my question :D > > > > > > The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same > > > address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour for any > > > list run by a non-idiot (like this one) > > > > Is that so? Then will you, please, explain how do people get their > > original messages back? > > There's a copy already in their outbox? And a sane mailer (like say > kmail) will have put the sent copy there already. > > -- > Alan McKinnon > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com >
I doubt it works that way. I always get mails back from the list, I can forward one to you, the headers should be proof enough. Of course it's possible to place a copy of your sent message in your inbox (and I know, kmail's got an option for that) but that's not standard behavior. It's merely a workaround for broken filters like gmail's.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
