On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 03:24:29PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:20:08 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: > > > Isn't BL2 masked ~arch? I think it was when I originally ran into this > > problem. Doesn't that mean that my system will upgrade stable packages > > that MUST be run using a package that I have to unmask? > > No. The BL2 init script provided with LVM must be used when running BL2, > they should not be used with BL1. If you are seeing the warning messages > it is because you have added the lvm init script to your runlevel when it > should not be there.
Thats ok, I can understand that. I'm just about ready to give up on this as its obviously too hard to debug. If upgrading to BL2 will fix my problems then that's what I must do. I can't test this tho as I haven't been able to break my test system with the updates. I just hope that BL2 will fix this and not just introduce further problems. I'll consider it and post back my results. Fingers and toes crossed that BL2 solves it :) Thanks Matt
pgpk3EI7wdNIR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
