-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

b.n. wrote:
> Chuck Robey ha scritto:
>> You might possibly be missing one of the most basic (in organization)
>> differences between any BSD and any Linux is that BSD's are all built and
>> packaged with a set of userland programs.  This doesn't include many user
>> applications, just the kind of things that you think of as being part
>> of any
>> base (like shells, or utilities like the various filesystem tools,
>> grep, find,
>> like that)  Linux, OTOH, is only a kernel.  Any time you go after a
>> distribution
>> that has more than the kernel (and ONLY the kernel) its because the group
>> putting together that distribution has decided to attach those parts,
>> but the
>> Linux developers are concerned with the kernel alone.
> 
> Ehm, thanks for the lesson, but I am actually well aware of that. I
> installed and used a lot of Linux distros and, to a lesser extent, BSD
> and other exotic systems (Hurd anyone?).
> 
> Instead, maybe you might possibly be missing the fact that kernel-BSD
> systems with GNU userlands have been attempted (Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
> being one - dunno about the Gentoo/FreeBSD port -is it still alive, by
> the way?). I wondered if there is the contrary, as a startpoint.
> 
>> So, when you talk about, say, FreeBSD, you're talking about kernel +
>> userland
>> base.  This isn't truie with Linux, so all linuxes are just a little bit
>> different in their choice of userland tools.
> 
> That's why I asked if there is some Linux that is not "a little bit" but
> *wildly* different, as to be almost unrecognizable as the Linux we're
> all familiar with (that usually is done by a bash/zsh/ksh shell + other
> gnu coreutils etc.)
> 
> For a (theoretical) example, imagine a system that boots in the Windows
> Powershell on top of the Linux kernel.
> 
> m.
> 

Sorry.  Not to be insulting, but it really sounded like a newbie question, which
is why I reacted that way.  On your own rereading, doesn't it sound a bit that
way to you, a bit?

I apologize, then.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkifhewACgkQz62J6PPcoOnGyQCfVJeYfaVDjZGChV/U92F3B6ve
pqoAni0TBcjaapnxKEmgK20+FcOS/X55
=g/B1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to