On Wednesday 17 September 2008, David Leverton wrote: > On Tuesday 16 September 2008 22:47:49 »Q« wrote: > > It's not "backwards logic". > > "The Paludis developer posts evidence that the liar is lying, therefore I'm > going to believe the liar" is entirely backwards.
since you can't stop and fill up may spam box: I provided evidence. You didn't. You have provided nothing. You attacked me. And you continued to attack me all day long. That says a lot about you. That is the last thing I will post in this thread or as an answer to you. So be happy.
