Volker Armin Hemmann writes: > On Wednesday 17 September 2008, kashani wrote: > > Vaeth wrote: > > >> Could you please use a mail client which insert correctly the > > >> fields "In-Reply-To" ans "Reference" ? > > > > > > Thanks for the hint, I was not aware of this. But unfortunately, it > > > appears that it is not just a question of the mail client: > > > I am subsribed to the list as post-only (for several reasons which > > > I do not want to discuss now) and I am actually reading/replying > > > the usenet copy linux.gentoo.user of this list. > > > If you know how I could find out (and use with pine) the correct > > > data in this way, I would be glad to do so, but I am afraid it is > > > impossible. [...] > > Trying to follow the thirty odd threads your client is creating when > > their should be only one is really really annoying. > > > > And you're completely wring about NAT routers, but damned if I can > > find the actual parts of the thread I want to respond to. > > > > kashani > > there is no problem with his posts in kmail.
Hmm, I have about seven Threads started by him with "Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way...". The other of his respsonses, which do not start a new thread, have this own posts as reference, not the one he is actually replying to. All references look like <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, seems like the mail-to-usenet gateway changes them. Couldn't he just reply with his usenet client, and the gateway would convert things back so it shows up correctly on the list? I agree it's a little annoying, but as long as it's just him and only occasionally, I don't mind. Wonko